tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12151546.post3925805389123660273..comments2023-10-30T17:00:09.044+08:00Comments on jellyfishing state: You never know...something about "Black Gold"Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12151546.post-84046094881767615412008-04-15T00:03:00.000+08:002008-04-15T00:03:00.000+08:00之前都沒有嗎?@@之前都沒有嗎?@@Jellyfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02281080437411191205noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12151546.post-56687232577159041212008-04-13T21:47:00.000+08:002008-04-13T21:47:00.000+08:00小小書房下週末有個公平貿易咖啡試飲聊天會,今天想去買豆子的時候正好碰到"生態綠"的老闆,據說是"華文...小小書房下週末有個<A HREF="http://blog.roodo.com/smallidea/archives/5822333.html" REL="nofollow">公平貿易咖啡試飲聊天會</A>,今天想去買豆子的時候正好碰到<A HREF="http://www.okogreen.com.tw/index.php" REL="nofollow">"生態綠"</A>的老闆,據說是"華文地區第一個公平貿易特許商"。目前只有咖啡豆,下一步是巧克力,真是滿心期待啊~shuanshuanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01405869774785299446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12151546.post-82023378406899252782008-03-11T14:36:00.000+08:002008-03-11T14:36:00.000+08:00嗯,wikipedia 上的 CSR 頁面有一些解釋,也指出一些爭議;我是對 CSR 抱持懷疑的.....嗯,<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_Social_Responsibility" REL="nofollow">wikipedia 上的 CSR 頁面</A>有一些解釋,也指出一些爭議;我是對 CSR 抱持懷疑的...shuanshuanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01405869774785299446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12151546.post-11362195391788373952008-03-11T13:09:00.000+08:002008-03-11T13:09:00.000+08:00找到妳的舊文了 :)何謂CSR...由此可見http://shuanshuansblog.blogs...找到妳的舊文了 :)<BR/>何謂CSR...由此可見http://shuanshuansblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/csr.htmlJellyfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02281080437411191205noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12151546.post-91823178847943702862008-03-11T05:13:00.000+08:002008-03-11T05:13:00.000+08:00Oh...CSR 是指Corporate Social Responsibility 嗎?Oh...CSR 是指Corporate Social Responsibility 嗎?Jellyfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02281080437411191205noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12151546.post-70137493187413432502008-03-10T17:14:00.000+08:002008-03-10T17:14:00.000+08:00曾經看過 The Undercover Economist 的書評,指出公平貿易咖啡的零售溢價,其實...曾經看過 <A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/Undercover-Economist-Exposing-Poor-Decent/dp/0195189779" REL="nofollow">The Undercover Economist</A> 的書評,指出公平貿易咖啡的零售溢價,其實是消費了消費者的社會公義意識,並非完全轉換成農人收入的增加,而且消費者似乎也不在意農人最終真正的收入增加情況,而只是享受自己做了公益這件事。這篇經濟學人的部落格文章 <A HREF="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2007/10/is_it_fair.cfm" REL="nofollow">How fair is it?</A> 後半在討論這個問題,舉的例子是 Costa 賣出的公平貿易卡布奇諾每杯溢價 10 便士,但推算回去,農人增加的收入換算起來每杯不到 1 便士;前半則是引另一位專欄作家的意見,質疑公平貿易的評鑑標準,其實是由進口商單向決定的。<BR/><BR/>另外,這篇 <A HREF="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2005/12/who_benefits_fr.html" REL="nofollow">Who benefits from fair trade?</A> 則指出,鼓勵公平貿易並進行市場區隔,從另一個角度來說,也等於是放任‘不公平/剝削貿易’繼續存在;少付一點、不在意農人受剝削,跟多付一點、期望農人得到公平待遇,都是可選項。只能希望起一點置換效果。<BR/><BR/>最近在想 CSR 的問題啦... :-Pshuanshuanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01405869774785299446noreply@blogger.com